Everyone gives up after one failure. Some continue after two. Very few push through three. But think of attempting seven times, being turned down 75 times by venture capitalists, and still anticipating that next one will succeed. That kind of persistence is unusual. It’s the type of determination that makes you either a success story or broken and shattered. For Pavan Guntupalli, a regular Telangana boy who was passionate about computers, it became the latter. But his journey in creating a transport company that is worth thousands of crores was far from easy.
The Telangana Boy Who Liked Two Things
Pavan, born in Telangana, comes from a family of farmers where nobody discussed startups or Silicon Valley ambitions. His parents were from a farming background, so money was made working hard in the fields, not through technology or apps. But Pavan was unlike the rest of the children in his locality. While they played football or cricket, Pavan spent his hours studying computer programming and stock trading.
He was a curious and intelligent kid who had an early interest in computers and the stock market. This wasn’t something he did as a hobby. He really liked knowing how the code operated and how markets behaved. For a kid from a small town, these were not common interests. Most students were concerned with scoring good grades to enrol in engineering colleges. Pavan did that as well, but his interests extended to more than textbooks.
His academic genius manifested early. He didn’t simply perform well in school; he aced everything he attempted academically. When it was time to study for the IIT entrance exam, one of the most difficult exams in the country, Pavan studied hard. Thousands of aspirants study for years, spend large sums on coaching institutions, and yet don’t qualify. Pavan broke the IIT-JEE exam and enrolled in IIT Kharagpur, where he received a Bachelor of Technology degree in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering.
Life at IIT and the Corporate World
At IIT Kharagpur, Pavan attended classes to gain actual experience. And by 2010, he was a summer associate at Reliance Communications Ltd. He actually gained experience about how big organisations worked, how telecom systems functioned, and what it really required to scale something. These experiences influenced his business and technology perspective.
After he finished his graduation at IIT Kharagpur in 2012, Pavan joined Samsung Research India as a software developer. For most people graduating from IIT, this would be the ultimate dream. A secure job at a well-regarded company like Samsung, developing the latest technology, a decent pay. Parents would be proud. Friends would envy. Life would be fixed. But Pavan was not satisfied.
He felt an insatiable urge to do something extraordinary. Reporting to the office each day, coding for somebody else’s product, taking directions from managers, it all seemed hollow to him. He admired the work, learned much, and appreciated the experience. But he knew, deep inside himself, that he wanted to create something of his own. He wanted to work on problems that were important to him, build things he cared about, and play risks that no corporate gig would permit.
The First Big Failure: theKarrier
When Pavan quit Samsung, he jumped straight into entrepreneurship. He partnered with his friend Arvind Sanka to launch their first venture called theKarrier, a company that used minitrucks to offer intercity logistics services. The concept was logical. India’s logistics industry was disorganised and inefficient. Small companies found it tough to move goods from one city to another. There was certainly a problem to be solved.
They opened theKarrier in April 2014. Pavan and Arvind spent months developing the platform, signing up truck owners, and attempting to acquire customers. They worked long hours, encountered infinite operational issues, and invested their energy into making it a success. But the venture didn’t scale and needed to be closed down. The logistics company proved to be more capital-intensive than anticipated. Margins were tight, operations were complicated, and competition was fierce.
For most new business owners, this failure would be a knockout. All that effort, all that hope, all those dreams, down the drain. Family and friends would begin to ask when you’re returning to a “real job.” The secure Samsung job would look mighty appealing in retrospect. But Pavan’s response to this failure said something about the character of the man. He didn’t take it as the final word. For others, a failed startup is the end. For Pavan, it was merely the start.
Six More Attempts That Flopped
Once theKarrier business closed, Pavan didn’t rush headlong into a new business. But his entrepreneurial brain continued to spin. He experimented with payments when the IMPS service came out, but his first venture came to a stumbling block within nine months. It was his second failure. The Indian payments space was filling up, and whatever he did failed to take off. Nine months’ worth of effort, resources, and time, down the drain.
He co-founded Roppen Labs, but this venture also didn’t take off. Details about what exactly Roppen Labs did aren’t widely documented, but the outcome was the same: failure. Then came more attempts. He went on to test seven more business ideas, and each one failed. Seven different business ideas. Seven times building something from scratch. Seven times watching it fail.
Every failure translated into something. Lost time. Lost money. Lost confidence. The psychological impact of failing over and over again is something most people do not get to know because they give up after one or two attempts. Friends would have probably stopped inquiring about his business endeavours. Relatives could have advised him to return to Samsung or pursue another corporate career. The sound practical advice would be to cut your losses and leave.
But Pavan didn’t give up. What propelled him? Stubbornness? Faith in himself? Refusal to accept defeat? Perhaps all of these. Whatever it was, he just didn’t give up. He learned from every failure, studied where he went wrong, and figured out what could be improved. Pavan’s most helpful method when he was at his lowest was to “Never step back”. This wasn’t just a motivational quotation for him. It was the way he lived.
The Man Behind the Failures
Knowing who Pavan is makes it easier to understand why he didn’t quit. He had a vision of creating something of his own, something that would transform how people get around their cities. That vision wasn’t for money or fame. He actually wanted to address an authentic issue that affected everyday people. That sort of thinking-for-purpose keeps you motivated when all else says quit.
Pavan’s relentless endurance, connected with his determination and commitment, helped him overcome the obstacles. These aren’t just nice words. They describe actual behaviour. When your seventh business fails, determination is what gets you out of bed to try an eighth time. When investors reject you for the 30th time, it is what makes you keep pitching. When friends think you’re crazy, commitment is what keeps you focused on your goal.
He is proficient in Korean, demonstrating his capacity to learn something difficult and adjust to new surroundings. This would later be very useful in his entrepreneurial path. A person who can learn an entirely new language possesses the patience and discipline to learn from business errors. His technical skillset from IIT and Samsung equipped him with the technical know-how to create products, but his personal attributes provided him with the resilience to endure several failures.
75 Times Investors Said No
By the time Pavan began to consider his eighth business venture, he had learned a few valuable lessons from all the failures. He realised that they needed to cut costs and deal directly with customers in order to make a profit. This was a valuable insight. A lot of his earlier ventures likely failed because they were capital-intensive or had multiple layers between the service and the customer.
He also watched the market closely. He saw that big startups like Uber and Ola only operate in big cities and on four-wheelers, leaving India’s inner cities with many issues. Traffic was worsening in cities of all sizes, not only metros. People needed cheaper and faster means to commute short distances. Cars were costly and remained stuck in traffic.
He found that there are about 20 crore bikes in India, not just in big cities but even in smaller ones. Motorcycles could navigate through traffic. They were economical with fuel. They were already being used unofficially for trips in many areas. What if there were an official service for bike taxis? This thought instilled something in his mind. Perhaps this was it. Perhaps this was the idea that would succeed at last.
The Harsh Reality of Raising Funds
In 2015, Pavan Guntupalli, Aravind Sanka, and Rishikesh SR started a bike taxi app. They developed the platform, tested small batches, and thought they had something unique. The idea made complete sense – low-cost bike rides beating traffic and catering to smaller cities that were not noticed by big companies. Now they needed money to scale up and launch appropriately.
This is where the true test came. 75 investors turned down his idea. Seventy-five individual meetings. Seventy-five presentations. Seventy-five times presenting his vision, presenting the data, presenting the opportunity. And seventy-five times the answer “no.” Investors rejected them with concerns about competition and uncertainty about the sustainability of the model.
Their fears were not unfounded. Uber and Ola controlled the ride-hailing space. How could a small company compete with them? Bike taxis had a regulatory limbo. Were they legal at all in most cities? Would the authorities shut them down? The market appeared dangerous, the competition seemed impossible to beat, and the team had no successes behind them, only failures.
Imagine facing that level of rejection. After already failing seven times, now you’re being told your eighth idea won’t work either. Each rejection probably stung a little more. Each “no” probably made him question if everyone else was right and he was wrong. For three years, Guntupalli struggled to gain traction. Three years of trying to convince someone, anyone, to believe in his vision.
The One Yes That Changed Everything
In 2016, things changed. The Managing Director and Chairman of Hero MotoCorp, Pavan Munjal, was the first investor that Pavan approached. It is curious to note that both of them shared a common first name, Pavan. However, more important was the fact that Munjal was more aware of two-wheelers than anyone else in India. Hero MotoCorp and AdvantEdge Partners were among the early investors.
Why did Munjal agree when 75 others refused? Perhaps he noticed what others didn’t. Perhaps his profound knowledge of the motorcycle market provided him with insight that financial investors didn’t possess. Perhaps he simply trusted Pavan’s resolve and vision. Whatever the reason, that single “yes” opened all the doors that had been slammed shut. With Hero MotoCorp’s support, other investors took notice. Funding began to flow. The bike taxi service could now finally launch correctly.
This bit of validation is worth something about entrepreneurship. You do not require everyone to believe in you. You require the right person to believe in you at the right time. Those 75 didn’t count once the 76th one said yes. All those failures did not count once one idea succeeded after all.
What Pavan Learned From All Those Failures
Reflecting on his experience with seven failed ventures, Pavan learned things textbooks can’t. For one, he discovered that failure is not the opposite of success; failure is on the path to success. Every failed venture taught him something in particular. theKarrier instructed him on the difficulties of capital-intensive ventures. The payments venture taught him about market timing and competition. Every subsequent failure contributed to his knowledge.
Second, he realised that the problems of actual people drive sustainable companies. His winning business didn’t pursue wealthy customers in high-end segments. It targeted daily commuters in average cities who wanted affordable rides. By reaching this enormous, neglected mass market segment, he created something with real demand.
Third, perseverance trumps impeccable timing. Sure, the market situation in 2015-2016 was more favourable for his bike taxi venture than it could have been otherwise. But even when the circumstances were favourable, he got rejected 75 times. What saved him was his inability to quit. Pavan explains, “Problems and challenges are like doors, welcoming us to explore ourselves, test our limits, and push our boundaries”.
The Birth of Rapido
All that failure, all those rejections, and all those learnings made Pavan finally create something that worked. Rapido was born in November 2014, starting in Bangalore with a minimal base fare and per-kilometre prices. The company initially maintained a base fare as low as Rs 15 and charged only Rs 3 per kilometre. The fares were extremely low, making the service affordable to nearly everyone but leaving profitability questions.
Those initial days were not smooth. Ola and Uber both introduced bike taxi services quickly, within a month of Rapido’s introduction. The established players noticed the gap in the market and attempted to stifle competition before it became too big. For Pavan and his team, this had to be like déjà vu. Would this be attempt number eight at failure?
But something unique occurred this time. Rapido targeted two important customer groups: those with no access to personal vehicles and those interested in flexible income options. Unlike the large players who targeted metros and premium users, Pavan’s team targeted tier-2 cities and price-sensitive commuters. They didn’t attempt to compete directly with Uber and Ola. They developed their own space in the market.
The business expanded gradually. Everyone enjoyed it because it solved their real issues – saving time stuck in traffic and saving money on transportation expenses. Riders enjoyed it because it provided them with flexible income options. The concept that 75 investors had turned down began to prove itself in the marketplace. Occasionally, the marketplace observes what investors do not.
FAQs
- How many companies did Pavan Guntupalli fail at before succeeding?
Pavan failed at seven various business endeavours, including theKarrier, a payments company, and Roppen Labs.
- How many investors turned Pavan’s bike taxi proposal down?
A straight 75 investors turned him down for the bike taxi proposal before Pawan Munjal of Hero MotoCorp invested.
- What was Pavan’s academic background?
He graduated with a degree in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering from IIT Kharagpur in 2012.
- Where was Pavan employed prior to beginning his entrepreneurial career?
He was a software developer at Samsung Research India after interning at Reliance Communications.
- What encouraged Pavan to continue despite so many setbacks?
His unshakeable determination, belief that issues are chances to push boundaries, and dedication to creating something worthwhile.
Discover Pavan Guntupalli’s journey on LinkedIn, and explore Rapido’s world through their Instagram and official website to see how the company is reshaping rides.
To know more about the birth and success of Rapido and how Pavan Gutupalli turned it into a unicorn, read the full success story here.
_______
For more inspiring business failure stories and business insights, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and discover the world of today’s leaders and innovators.
