Elon Musk can step down as CEO of Tesla if its shareholders vote down his proposed $1 trillion pay package, a warning issued by company Chair Robyn Denholm on Monday. The shareholder letter was sent just before Tesla’s Nov. 6 annual meeting. The board is seeking shareholders’ approval of what would be one of the largest executive pay packages ever devised.
Denholm wrote that the compensation package is meant to keep Musk at Tesla for a minimum of another seven and a half years. She added that Musk’s leadership is “critical” to the company’s success and without the right motivation, Tesla might lose his “time, talent and vision.” The chair contended that this huge pay package is needed as Tesla competes to be a world leader in artificial intelligence and self-driving car technology.
Performance-Based Package Linked to Astronomical Targets
The package being proposed isn’t simply awarding Musk a trillion dollars directly. Rather, it would offer him 12 sets of stock options, but only if he achieves extremely aggressive targets. They involve driving Tesla’s market value to $8.5 trillion and achieving significant milestones in autonomous driving technology and robotics. Currently, Tesla is worth well less than that goal.
Denholm’s letter attempts to persuade investors that the package is reasonable in that it makes Musk’s rewards directly dependent on shareholder value and long-term company growth. She also asked shareholders to re-elect three directors who have served on the board for decades and collaborate closely with Musk. The entire presentation is founded upon the premise that Tesla must have Musk more than Musk must have Tesla.
Tesla Board Faces Questions About Independence
Tesla’s directors have been under fire for years due to how closely aligned they are with Musk. Numerous governance experts and shareholder activist organizations question if the directors can truly make decisions independent of him. A Delaware court rejected Musk’s 2018 compensation agreement earlier this year after determining that it was approved improperly by directors that weren’t entirely independent.
That court ruling ruled that the negotiating process wasn’t equitable and the directors were overly swayed by Musk. The board is now returning with an even larger pay package and with similar doubts if they’re genuinely looking out for ordinary shareholders or simply happy to keep Musk content. The November 6 vote will indicate whether investors think the company requires this huge pay package to retain Musk on board, or whether they feel the board is handing over too much money without adequate oversight. Musk might step down from Tesla as CEO if the $1 trillion pay plan is spurned by the shareholders next month.
News At Glance
- Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm threatened Elon Musk to quit if his $1 trillion pay package is not approved
- The performance-based plan rewards Musk based on goals such as $8.5 trillion market value
- Package aimed to retain Musk at Tesla for a minimum of seven and a half more years
- Tesla’s board gets attacked about independence and close affinity with Musk
- Delaware court invalidated Musk’s 2018 pay package earlier this year for wrong approval procedure
FAQs
Q: Why is Tesla giving Musk such a gigantic pay package?
A: The board explains that they must incentivize Musk and keep him committed to heading Tesla for at least another seven and a half years. They assert his leadership is essential as the company attempts to emerge as a leader in artificial intelligence and autonomous technology.
Q: Would Musk even receive $1 trillion in cash?
A: No, the package awards him stock options that are divided into 12 distinct categories. He only receives compensation if Tesla achieves extremely ambitious targets such as reaching a market capitalization of $8.5 trillion and making groundbreaking advancements in self-driving and robotics.
Q: Shareholders when will they vote on this compensation package?
A: The shareholders will vote on the pay plan during Tesla’s annual meeting on November 6. They will vote on whether to approve the compensation package and re-elect three directors on the board who collaborate with Musk.
Q: Why are Tesla’s board members being faulted for this?
A: Governance analysts and advocacy organizations question whether the board is really independent of Musk. A Delaware judge already rejected his 2018 compensation agreement this year, stating that directors weren’t independent enough and the approval process was improper.
Q: What if shareholders vote no?
A: In Chair Robyn Denholm’s letter, Musk might resign as CEO of Tesla. His “time, talent and vision” would be lost to the company at the critical juncture that Tesla is attempting to compete in autonomous car technology and artificial intelligence.
___________
For more world breaking news and leadership insights, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine.
