‘Silicon Six’ Accused of Avoiding $278bn in US Corporation Tax
The world’s largest tech firms have been accused of underpaying taxes on a staggering scale. According to the Fair Tax Foundation (FTF), Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Netflix, Apple, and Microsoft – collectively known as the “Silicon Six” – avoided paying nearly $278 billion in US corporation taxes over a decade. This revelation has sparked concerns about how these corporations leverage tax loopholes and use aggressive strategies to minimise their tax contributions.
The Scale of Tax Discrepancies in the US Corporation Tax System
Between them, the Silicon Six generated a colossal $11 trillion in revenue and $2.5 trillion in profits over the last 10 years. However, their average corporation tax rate stood at only 18.8% globally. This is significantly lower than the 29.7% statutory corporate tax rate that applies to most US companies earning similar profits.
When excluding one-off repatriation tax payments arising from historical tax avoidance, their effective tax rate drops even further to just 16.1%. The FTF claims this disparity highlights deep flaws in the global tax system and illustrates how large corporations exploit these gaps to their advantage.
How Corporations Reduce Their US Corporation Tax Burden
Paul Monaghan, CEO of the Fair Tax Foundation, stated that companies like the Silicon Six have “hardwired tax avoidance into their corporate structures.” Researchers identified several aggressive techniques, including taking contingency tax positions and booking profits in low-tax jurisdictions.
1. Contingency Practices:
The FTF alleged that the tech firms had inflated their reported tax contributions by $82 billion over the years. These inflated figures rely on “contingency tax payments,” which allocate funds for potential tax liabilities that companies anticipate they will never actually pay.
2. Low-Tax Jurisdictions:
A major element of these strategies involves funnelling revenue through countries with lower tax rates. Amazon, for example, has been criticised for attributing a significant portion of its UK income to Luxembourg, a tax-friendly jurisdiction. This allows such firms to escape higher tax rates, a practice detailed here.
Netflix, another notable example, recorded one of the lowest effective tax rates in the group, at just 14.7%. Analysts have pointed to glaring inconsistencies in how taxes are reported across the organisation’s global operations.
Breaking Down Tax Contributions Among the Silicon Six
The Fair Tax Foundation provided a breakdown of how some companies compare in terms of US corporation tax contributions relative to their worldwide operations:
- Netflix: Recorded the lowest tax rate at 14.7%, prompting concerns about consistent underpayment.
- Amazon: Criticised for profit shifting, yet its tax rate stands higher at 19.6%.
- Meta (Facebook): Paid just 15.4%, well below the US average.
- Apple: At 18.4%, its tax conduct remains under scrutiny for inflated tax reporting.
- Microsoft: Paid the highest overall rate among the group at 20.4%, although still under the statutory rate.
Each company defended its practices, maintaining they operate within the bounds of international laws. For example, Netflix stated, “Governments determine tax rules and rates, and companies comply with them.” Similarly, Amazon argued its tax conduct aligns with laws that encourage investment in infrastructure and job creation.
What the Findings Mean for Future US Corporation Tax Policy
The FTF report arrives in the midst of heated debates about corporate tax reforms aimed at levelling the playing field between multinational corporations and smaller businesses. Policymakers face increasing pressure to close tax loopholes that allow firms to reroute their profits or report them in low-tax locations.
Significantly, the presence of tech giants’ CEOs, including Jeff Bezos (Amazon) and Tim Cook (Apple), alongside Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg at political events like Donald Trump’s inaugurations, has raised eyebrows about how much influence the Silicon Six exert over tax legislation.
Monaghan noted that international tax laws need urgent reforms to ensure “big tech” pays its fair share. Specific points of concern include tax breaks for “foreign-derived intangible income,” mechanisms that further reduce their effective tax burdens.
How the Silicon Six’s low tax rates affect businesses globally
The discrepancies in tax contributions between multinational tech corporations and sectors like banking or energy highlight disparities in global business practices. These inconsistencies trigger broader questions about competition and fairness:
- Impact on Small Businesses: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often bear the brunt of higher tax rates, having fewer resources to exploit tax loopholes. Competing with massive corporations enjoying reduced tax obligations poses a significant disadvantage to newer businesses.
- Global Economic Inequalities: With global giant firms funnelling profits through low-tax jurisdictions, many countries suffer from reduced public service funding due to lower tax revenues.
Driving Accountability for US Corporation Tax Reform
The $278 billion figure demonstrates how much tax regulators may have missed out on, potentially undermining funding for critical infrastructure and social programs. Tackling this issue requires collaboration between governments, tax watchdogs, and businesses to establish a clear standard of fairness.
Governments and organisations calling for accountability point out that reforming the tax system will ensure vital revenues are reinvested into communities, while also guaranteeing a level playing field. Ending preferential tax treatment for multinational corporations like Amazon and Netflix will be integral to restoring trust in the economic system.
Source
The Guardian – ‘Silicon Six’ accused of avoiding almost $278bn
Explore more entrepreneurial insights and success stories at Inspirepreneur, your go-to magazine for business innovation and leadership.
