Trump Declares End to All Canada Trade Talks

Trump Ends Trade Talks With Canada After Controversial Ad

US President Donald Trump has declared the complete termination of all trade negotiations with Canada, citing what he described as a “fraudulent and insulting” advertisement aired by the Ontario government. The ad, which featured the late former US President Ronald Reagan speaking against tariffs, reportedly angered Trump, who accused Canada of using Reagan’s image “to interfere in American policy.” Posting on Truth Social late Thursday, Trump said: “Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”​

Advertisement Sparks Diplomatic Fallout

The advertisement at the center of the dispute aired across Canadian and US networks, featuring Reagan’s voice from a 1987 radio broadcast in which he warned that trade barriers “hurt every worker and consumer.” Canadian officials said the ad was part of an awareness campaign to show the long-term harm of tariffs, amid ongoing economic tensions with Washington. However, Trump’s administration labeled it “deceptive propaganda,” accusing Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of undermining US interests. The fallout has erased months of progress in bilateral trade talks aimed at revising portions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).​

Canada Pledges to “Defend Its Interests”

In response, Prime Minister Carney said his government “will always stand up for Canadian businesses and workers,” but avoided direct confrontation with the US. He emphasized that Canada remains committed to fair trade while expanding ties with other global markets to offset potential US tariffs. Trump has already imposed a 35% tariff on Canadian aluminum and steel exports, with additional duties on vehicles expected soon. Economists warn that if talks remain frozen, both nations could experience disruptions in cross-border manufacturing, particularly in the auto and energy sectors, which rely on tightly integrated supply chains.​

News At Glance

  • Trump ends all trade talks with Canada over a controversial anti-tariff ad.
  • The Ontario government ad featured Ronald Reagan’s 1987 speech criticizing tariffs.
  • Prime Minister Mark Carney vows to defend Canada’s economic interests.
  • Tariffs of up to 35% on metals and vehicles are already straining trade relations.

FAQs

  1. Why did Trump end trade talks with Canada?

Trump criticized Canada for running a false ad in Ronald Reagan’s voice criticizing tariffs as an “act of bad faith.”

  1. What was the ad about?

The Ontario government produced the ad using Reagan’s 1987 speech against trade barriers, allegedly to highlight the risks of Trump’s tariffs.

  1. How did Canada respond?

Prime Minister Mark Carney stated that Canada would protect its workers and consider expanding trade with other nations.

  1. What could this mean for North American trade?

Experts warn the breakdown may disrupt the automotive and metals trade, raising costs within the USMCA trading bloc.

___________

For more breaking news and leadership insights from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter.

Trump Government Will Fight Lawsuits Over $100,000 Foreign Worker Visas

The Trump administration announced on Thursday that it will fight all lawsuits attempting to block its new $100,000 H1B visa fee. The visas allow American businesses to employ foreign workers for specific positions. The new charge has incensed many firms and triggered numerous lawsuits.

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters the government is standing firm on the new fee, which started on September 21. President Donald Trump announced the policy last month. “The administration will fight these lawsuits in court,” Leavitt said at Thursday’s press meeting.

The new fee is almost 30 times greater than what businesses payed. It currently costs approximately $3,600 to obtain an H1B visa. Now businesses are having to pay $100,000 in addition to the normal processing fee for new employees from outside of America. This immense increase has alarmed businesses nationwide.

Business Groups Claim Fee Violates Law

The US Chamber of Commerce sued the new fee on October 16. The group acts for roughly 300,000 businesses in America. They contend the $100,000 fee violates immigration law because fees need to cover what it takes to process the applications, not be utilized to shift policy.

“The new $100,000 visa fee will be prohibitively expensive for US employers, particularly start-ups and small and midsize firms, to use the H1B program,” said Chamber of Commerce’s Neil Bradley. He indicated that many companies will abandon the H1B program altogether because they cannot afford the expense.

A second group sued on October 3 in California. That group consists of unions such as the United Auto Workers, health professionals, schools and churches. They labeled the fee “arbitrary and capricious,” which means they believe the government acted without justifiable motives.

Government Says Fee Will End Cheating

Leavitt justified the policy by stating that businesses have been defrauding the H1B system long enough. “For far too long, the H1B visa system has been spammed with fraud, and that’s driven down American wages,” she said. The government feels the exorbitant fee will deter businesses from replacing American workers with foreign workers at a cheaper rate.

The fee is only for new employees arriving from outside the United States after September 21. Individuals already holding H1B visas are exempt. Individuals renewing their visas also do not need to pay the new fee, government officials say.

Approximately 70 percent of holders of H1B visas are from India. The new policy is, therefore, particularly relevant to India’s tech industry, which exports a large number of employees to America. Indian tech firms and employees are closely monitoring this situation.

Politicians on Both Sides Concerned Over the Fee

Several lawmakers have requested Trump to reconsider this policy. Democrats and Republicans are concerned. They are afraid the excessive fee will harm businesses that rely on innovation and make America less competitive against other nations.

Small businesses and start-ups are particularly concerned. They usually require specialized labor but cannot afford as much as large corporations. It would cost them $100,000 per employee to pay, possibly leading them to cut back on recruitment plans or outsource operations overseas where labor is cheaper.

The cases will now proceed in federal courts. Judges will determine if the Trump administration has the right to charge this kind of high fee. The process may take months or even years before it reaches a conclusion. In the meantime, the $100,000 fee is still valid for new requests.

FAQs

  1. Who needs to pay the new $100,000 H1B visa fee?

Firms that are hiring new foreign workers outside America on or after September 21 are required to pay the fee in addition to standard processing fees.

  1.  Is the fee payable by individuals with existing H1B visas?

No, the fee is only imposed on new applicants and not on existing H1B holders or individuals renewing their visa.

  1. Why did the Trump administration introduce this fee?

The government indicates it will prevent businesses from gaming the system and substituting American labor with lower-paid foreign workers.

  1. Who is suing to prevent the new fee?

The US Chamber of Commerce and a coalition that includes unions, health care providers, schools and religious organizations have each filed lawsuits separately.

  1. What country is most impacted by this new policy?

India is hit the hardest because roughly 70 percent of H1B visa recipients are from India, particularly technology professionals.

___________

Stay Inspired. Stay Informed. For more breaking news from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine.

Intel Makes More Profit Than Predicted After Big Cost Cuts

Intel posted stronger profits than anyone had anticipated for the fiscal period ending in September. The stock price of the computer chip company rose by 7 percent when news of the profits was released. The new chief at the company, Lip-Bu Tan, has been reducing expenses aggressively, and efforts are paying off now.

This is the first time Intel reported since receiving enormous sums of money from a number of large investors. Nvidia committed to investing $5 billion, Japan’s SoftBank contributed $2 billion, and the US government purchased a 10 percent stake for $8.9 billion. 

Intel already got the SoftBank funds but hasn’t yet received the Nvidia cash, said Dave Zinsner, who manages Intel’s money. The investments are a lifeline for the struggling company, which has been having trouble keeping pace with rivals.

Stock Price Recovers After Bad Year

Intel had a horrible year last year. The stock value fell around 60 percent due to the severe issues the company was experiencing. Things have been quite different this year, however. Intel stock has increased almost 90 percent through 2025 due to the fresh investments. That has caused Intel stock to perform better than Nvidia stock this year,.

Michael Schulman, managing investments at Running Point Capital, said stocks rose because the company demonstrated that it is gaining ground on costs and profit margins. The fresh funds from investors also puts people in better spirits about Intel’s future.

Strong Demand for Chips

Demand for Intel’s chips has been so high that the company cannot produce enough to fill all of the orders. Zinsner told them they are shipping short of demand currently, which he referred to as “a high-class problem.” Data center providers have found they must upgrade their chips in order to keep up with advances in technology, particularly for executing intelligent programs.

But Intel continues to struggle with producing its newest chips. Zinsner explained that the company’s process for fabricating its 18A technology is not currently functioning sufficiently. He projects that it will not get to an acceptable level until 2027.

Big Changes Under New Boss

The new CEO Tan has made radical changes since he took over. He has reduced expenses drastically and shed pieces of the business. Intel will have over 20 percent fewer employees by the end of this year compared to last year.

The former chief, Pat Gelsinger, had grand ambitions to transform Intel into a leading chip manufacturer for others to compete with Taiwan’s TSMC. But they were costly and resulted in Intel posting its first annual loss since 1986 in the previous year. Tan has reined in those ambitious schemes and set about correcting Intel’s core business.

In the September quarter, Intel registered an adjusted profit of 23 cents per share. Analysts had forecasted only 1 cent per share, and hence Intel comfortably exceeded expectations. Intel expects revenue of $12.8 billion to $13.8 billion for the next quarter, which is around what analysts had forecast.

FAQs

  1. Why did the stock price of Intel rise?

Intel posted far healthier profits than anticipated and was rewarded with billions in fresh investments from Nvidia, SoftBank and the US government.

  1. How much have investors invested in Intel recently?

Nvidia committed to invest $5 billion, SoftBank contributed $2 billion, and the US government took an $8.9 billion stake.

  1. Is Intel producing sufficient chips to keep up with demand?

No, Intel responded that demand is so high they can’t produce enough chips currently to fulfill all orders.

  1. What changes has the new CEO made?

Lip-Bu Tan has reduced expenses significantly, cut the workforce by more than 20 percent, and reined in costly manufacturing plans.

  1. When will Intel’s newest manufacturing technology be ready?

The company stated that its 18A manufacturing process will probably not be at acceptable quality levels until 2027.

___________

Stay Inspired. Stay Informed. For more breaking business news and insights from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter.

Trump Frees Binance’s Founder After Four-Month Prison Sentence

Trump Pardons Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao After Four-Month Sentence

​​US President Donald Trump has granted a pardon to Changpeng Zhao, the billionaire founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, who received a four-month prison sentence in 2024 for breaking US money laundering regulations. The White House confirmed the decision on Thursday is another sign that Trump’s administration is taking a friendlier stance toward crypto.

Zhao’s Conviction Stemmed from the Binance Scandal

Zhao, widely known in the cryptocurrency community as “CZ”, pleaded guilty last year to failing to maintain an adequate anti-money laundering program at Binance. The US Department of Justice had found that his platform allowed illegal transactions linked to drug trafficking and terrorism. After his plea, Binance agreed to pay $4.3 billion, which is one of the biggest corporate penalties ever in US history. Zhao paid a $50 million personal penalty, resigned as CEO, and started serving his sentence in April 2024. He finished serving his prison time in September of that year.​

White House Defends Pardon, Citing “Overreach” by Previous Administration

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that President Trump used his constitutional authority to “correct” what he described as overreach by the Biden administration, which she said had been “hostile to crypto innovation.” Trump’s team has also emphasized his goal to make the United States “the crypto capital of the world.” In his statement, Trump said Zhao had been “recommended by many people” and that “a lot of good people” insisted that what he did “wasn’t even a crime.” Zhao expressed gratitude on social media, thanking Trump for “upholding fairness, innovation, and justice”.​

News at a Glance

  • President Trump pardons Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, also known as CZ.
  • Zhao served four months in prison for failing to enforce anti-money laundering protections.
  • Binance paid $4.3 billion in penalties to settle its US case in 2024.
  • The White House calls the pardon a correction of “regulatory overreach” against crypto.

FAQ

  1. Why was Changpeng Zhao imprisoned?

He pleaded guilty to violating US anti-money laundering laws after authorities found Binance allowed unlawful financial transactions.

  1. How much time did Zhao serve?

Zhao served four months of a federal prison term before being released in September 2024.

  1. Why did Trump pardon him?

Trump explained that he wanted to “fix an overreach” by the former administration and encourage innovation in cryptocurrency regulation.

  1. What does this mean for Binance?

The pardon may enable Zhao to resume business activities with Binance, which remains the world’s largest crypto exchange.

BigBasket Journey: Hari Menon’s Rs 22,400 Crore Success 

Hari Menon was once again at the same crossroads where he had once failed twelve years earlier. It was the year 2011, and he was set to attempt something that had already ruined his reputation once. He wanted to attempt launching an online grocery store once again. Anybody else would have quit after the sort of failure he experienced with Fabmart. But Menon didn’t see anything different this time. India had transformed, and he was willing to risk everything on that transformation.

This is a story about how a failed businessman returned to create BigBasket, India’s largest online grocery platform, and demonstrated that sometimes you simply have to wait for the appropriate time.

Learning from the Ashes of Fabmart

Once Fabmart closed shop in 2001, Menon did not vanish. He remained close to the retail industry, observing and learning. He and his Fabmart friends took their failed internet-based business and converted it into Fabmall, an offline grocery chain. They merged it with another store named Trinethra and expanded to 300 stores in South India. They sold the entire business to the Aditya Birla Group for a huge sum in 2006, and it was subsequently named “More.”

Those years taught Menon all there was to know about operating grocery stores. He learned about supply chains, stock management, how to handle suppliers, and what consumers really needed. The contrast between those years and his Fabmart experience was immense. At Fabmart, he was over-running reality. With Fabmall, he learned the hard lesson of how retail operates on the ground.

But even as he was operating physical shops, Menon never forgot that initial dream. He witnessed India’s internet community gradually increase from half a million to a few million. He saw smartphones beginning to surface in people’s palms. He observed companies such as Flipkart demonstrating that Indians would buy online if you made it convenient enough. By 2010, Menon had a secret. The same concept that had killed Fabmart in 1999 could possibly succeed in 2011. India was ready now.

Starting BigBasket in 2011

It was October 2011 when Menon reunited his original Fabmart team. VS Sudhakar, Vipul Parekh, Abhinay Choudhari, and VS Ramesh were all part of the group. They had all weathered the dot-com bust together, and they all knew what had gone wrong the first time.

This time, there was a difference. India had more than 100 million internet users now. Smartphones were spreading rapidly. Online payment methods actually functioned. Above all, other companies had already demonstrated that e-commerce was possible in India. Flipkart was selling electronics and books successfully. Folks were becoming accustomed to online shopping.

The team began in Bangalore. They didn’t have high-end warehouses initially. Instead, they purchased products from Metro Cash and Carry stores and utilized them as warehouses. Team members literally stood in Metro stores, waiting for orders to arrive so they could package and ship them.

In February 2012, they secured their first genuine funding round, receiving 61 crore rupees from Ascent Capital. This was enormous as it indicated that investors would risk investing in online groceries once more, even after what had happened to Fabmart.

The Early Struggles Were Real

The initial six months were tough. Despite India’s transformation, getting people to shop for groceries online was extremely difficult. Indians were accustomed to feeling and smelling vegetables before purchasing them. People enjoyed their local stores where they knew the shopkeeper. Ordering dal and rice on a website seemed illogical to most individuals.

Menon and his team would rise at 3:30 AM daily to purchase fresh vegetables and fruits from wholesale markets. They did it themselves because they had to ensure the quality was impeccable. If customers received bad vegetables even once, they would never return.

Cash was scarce, and they grew slowly. But the team saw something promising. Customers who tried BigBasket returned time and time again. They had 25-30% monthly growth in orders by the first year, and 60-70% of customers were repeat buyers. This was despite the fact that they spent hardly any money on marketing. Word of mouth brought the majority of customers.

Building Trust Takes Time

The team recognized that grocery shopping is a personal activity. If you deliver a bad onion or rotten milk, people will never trust you again. So BigBasket went wild on quality control. They inspected each product before it was shipped from the warehouse. They coached delivery personnel to be courteous and punctual. They ensured customers could return products if they were not satisfied.

In 2014, they launched in Chennai, Pune, and Delhi. Every new city was an experiment. Would customers in these cities believe in an online grocery store? The response came in the affirmative, but it took time. Creating trust in every city took months of flawless deliveries and good service.

Things had improved by 2015. They hired Shah Rukh Khan as their brand ambassador. This was a big move because it indicated that they were serious about being a name in the household. They also introduced Express Delivery, delivering groceries to your doorstep in 60 minutes. This was ridiculously ambitious, but it worked.

The Real Growth Begins

BigBasket reached 1,000 crore rupees in sales in 2016. They had 5 million customers at that point. The business model was now successful. They initiated a B2B segment to supply to restaurants and hotels. They brought in smaller organizations such as Delyver to enhance delivery infrastructure.

By 2017, they had approximately 4 million registered customers and were making 150 crore rupees in sales per month. The growth was organic and genuine, not due to nutty discounts like other e-commerce firms. Their average order value was about 1,500 rupees, and customers used to come back repeatedly.

In March 2019, they also raised 150 million dollars from the likes of Alibaba and Mirae Asset. This funding had valued BigBasket at more than 1 billion dollars, and it was now a unicorn. Menon had succeeded. The guy whose first grocery venture had bombed big time was now heading a billion-dollar company.

The Pandemic Changed Everything

The COVID-19 pandemic hit India, and suddenly everyone needed to order groceries online. People who would never have tried BigBasket before had no choice. They were stuck at home and needed food.

BigBasket’s orders went through the roof. They moved from processing thousands of orders a day to hundreds of thousands. The systems were pushed to the limit. Menon and his team worked day and night to keep pace. They added more staff, more warehouses, and more delivery vehicles in a flash.

By mid-2020, BigBasket was at 1 billion dollars in annual revenues. They were shipping more than 300,000 orders per day. The pandemic had leapfrogged their growth by several years. What could have taken five years took just five months.

Tata Group Steps In

The explosive expansion also created explosive attention. India’s largest conglomerate, Tata Group, was paying attention. Tata envisioned creating a super app that would rival Amazon and Flipkart, and it needed a robust grocery platform.

In May 2021, Tata Digital acquired a 64% stake in BigBasket for approximately 9,500 crore rupees. This placed the valuation of BigBasket at about 13,500 crore rupees or approximately 1.85 billion dollars. For Menon, this was vindication. The concept that had not worked in 1999 was now valued at billions.

The acquisition was timely. Alibaba, the Chinese investor, wanted to leave India because of political unrest, and BigBasket required a robust Indian ally to battle JioMart of Reliance. Tata provided them with the support and capital to do that battle. Menon and the original team remained to operate the business. The transaction wasn’t money-oriented. It was about creating something larger within the Tata family.

Life After Tata

With Tata as its owner, BigBasket kept expanding. In January 2023, they raised further 200 million dollars, increasing their valuation to 3.2 billion dollars. They were folded into Tata’s super app, Tata Neu, that managed the entire grocery requirements of Tata’s millions of customers.

By 2024, BigBasket was present in more than 30 cities and fulfilling nearly 15 million orders in a month. Their yearly revenue surpassed 10,000 crore rupees. They had more than 20 million consumers and had over 22,000 employees.

The company also diversified beyond online delivery. In 2021, they launched their first brick-and-mortar store named Fresho in Bangalore. These were technologically enabled self-service stores that blended online and offline shopping. The intention was to go up to 200 stores by 2023 and 800 stores by 2026.

They introduced a 10-minute food delivery service in Bangalore in 2025 directly competing against Swiggy and Zomato. They were no longer merely a grocery delivery firm. They were turning into a full-fledged food and essentials platform.

What Made BigBasket Succeed

The largest factor that BigBasket succeeded where Fabmart couldn’t was timing. India in 2011 had the infrastructure it lacked in 1999. People had smartphones, broadband internet, and credit card payment capability. The environment was set up.

But timing is only part of the explanation. Menon and his group managed because they learned from their failures. They knew supply chains because they operated physical stores for years. They knew customer behavior because they witnessed Fabmart’s failure firsthand. They constructed slowly and cautiously rather than throwing money at growth.

Trust was paramount. Unlike their discounting peers competing with each other on price, BigBasket emphasized quality and reliability. They ensured that each tomato arrived fresh and each delivery was done on time. That engendered loyalty that the discounters could not purchase.

Technology also had a lot to do with it. BigBasket spent big time and money on their systems. They utilized data to forecast what customers would buy, handled inventory effectively, and optimized delivery routes. This was not merely a grocery store with an app. It was a technology firm that happened to sell groceries.

The team was important too. Menon chose to surround himself with people who had fought the wars alongside him. They trusted one another and made swift decisions. When the pandemic broke out and they had to ramp up quickly, that trust enabled them to speed ahead of rivals.

What This Means for Entrepreneurs

Menon’s tale has something strong to teach about failure. His first stab at online groceries laid him waste and lost investors millions. Anybody would have quit. But Menon realized that his concept wasn’t bad, merely premature.mHe spent twelve years preparing for his second attempt. He learned the business inside and out. He waited for the market to be ready. When he finally launched BigBasket, he had everything he needed to succeed.

The moral isn’t that you just keep repeating the same failed concept time and time again. The moral is that if you are truly passionate about something, sometimes you must wait for the world to catch up with your vision. Spend that waiting period learning, preparing, and understanding why you didn’t succeed the first time.

Menon also demonstrated that comeback stories exist. Back in business circles, folks wrote him off after Fabmart. Nobody thought that he would create something big again. But he didn’t give up. He kept his head down, learned from the past mistakes, and returned stronger.

Where BigBasket Stands Today

Now, BigBasket is the fifth largest grocery retailer in India, behind only offline biggies such as DMart and Reliance. For an online platform that began little more than a decade ago, this is humongous.

The company touches the lives of millions of customers each month, ships everything from vegetables to electronics, and is a household name in urban India. Menon, who is in his sixties, continues to run the company as CEO, although succession planning has been discussed in the past as Tata seeks to reinforce BigBasket’s position.

India’s grocery e-commerce market is worth billions and expanding rapidly. Players such as Swiggy Instamart, Blinkit, and Zepto are fighting aggressively in rapid commerce, with 10-15-minute grocery deliveries. BigBasket is also countering with a quick delivery offering while continuing its conventional model.

Legacy of Hari Menon

The journey is not done. BigBasket continues to expand, continue to battle competition, and continue to pursue more of India’s enormous grocery market. But what Menon has done up to now is impressive. He took a failure that exploded in the face of a good idea and waited for the ideal time before constructing it to become one of India’s greatest startups.

From the failure of Fabmart to the success of BigBasket, Hari Menon’s career spanned more than two decades. It’s one of patience, of learning, of timing, and of taking a risk and trying again after failure. Sometimes the greatest concepts are just waiting for their time.

Five Fast Facts

1. BigBasket was launched in October 2011, twelve years after Fabmart’s failure.

2. The firm turned into a unicorn in March 2019 and was worth more than 1 billion dollars.

3. Tata Group acquired 64% of BigBasket in May 2021 for around 9,500 crore rupees.

4. BigBasket currently processes around 15 million orders every month in 30+ Indian cities.

5. The company achieved 10,000 crore rupees in yearly revenue in 2024.

FAQ

  1. Who is Hari Menon?

Hari Menon is the founder of BigBasket.

  1. What was Hari Menon’s first business?

Fabmart was Menon’s first business. 

  1. How did Hari Menon start BigBasket?

He started BigBasket after failing his first business and waiting for the right time and experience. And it was launched in October 2011, twelve years after Fabmart’s failure.

  1. What is the net worth of BigBasket?

Net worth of BigBasket is around $3.2 billion. It turned into a unicorn in March 2019 and was worth more than 1 billion dollars.

To know more about Hari Menon and his inspiring journey, follow him on LinkedIn and X, and explore BigBasket’s official website along with their X, Instagram, and Facebook pages to stay updated on their growth, innovations, and new ventures.

___________

Stay Inspired. Stay Informed. For more breaking stories and leadership insights from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter.

Hari Menon: How Fabmart’s Failure Paved BigBasket’s Billion-Dollar Success

It was 1999, Silicon Valley start-ups were making millionaires overnight, and Hari Menon was preparing to open India’s first internet-based grocery store. He had the dream, the plan, and the conviction that Indian housewives would adore internet shopping with a mere click of the mouse. What he lacked was an impoverished customer base that could afford the internet.

Fabmart was going to revolutionise Indian shopping. Instead, it was one of India’s largest dot-com flops, burning through investors’ funds and leaving Menon professionally shattered. But this wasn’t a matter of a bad concept or lack of execution. This was about a person who attended a party a whole decade before anyone showed up. Occasionally in business, being much too early is far worse than being late.

The Man Behind Fabmart

Hari Menon was raised middle-class in a time when entrepreneurship was not cool to pursue in India. The typical route was simple: attend college, earn an engineering degree, secure a stable job, and develop a stable, predictable career. Menon did this for a period of time, but something within him just couldn’t accept the situation.

Upon completion of his studies, Menon began working in India’s growing IT sector in the 1990s. He was employed at Wipro, one of India’s first IT firms, where he witnessed first-hand the impact of technology on the way businesses operated. Afterwards, he shifted to Planet Asia, where he gained greater exposure to systems, logistics, and customer service operations at a large scale.

It was his deep interest in how people shop products that set Menon apart from thousands of other IT experts. While his peers worked on developing software for companies, Menon couldn’t help but wonder about another question: How can technology simplify the lives of ordinary citizens? In the evenings, he read about Amazon’s US success story and observed how e-commerce was beginning to revolutionise retail in developed nations. The seed for Fabmart was sown in these years of observation and learning.

Corporate Years and Expanding Dreams

Menon’s corporate years may not have been flashy, but they were constructive. At Wipro, he was involved in projects that provided him with a profound insight into complex supply chains and delivery mechanisms. He saw how products travelled from manufacturers to distributors to retailers, and how at every step cost and complexity were added.

At Planet Asia, Menon learned about customer relationship systems and logistics management. They were not charming skills, but these were the lifeblood of the retail business. He began learning about inventory details, supplier relationships, and why you would want dependable delivery networks.

By the late 1990s, India’s technology industry was on fire. The Y2K issue had generated huge demand for Indian programmers, and capital was pouring into anything technological. But Menon saw one peculiar thing: while Indian firms were creating technology for the world, Indian customers had nearly no technology services designed for them. That gap disturbed him. He felt that if Americans could shop online, then there was no reason why Indians could not do so. This assumption would cost him heavily soon enough.

Beginning Fabmart in 1999

In 1999, when the dot-com boom was at its height worldwide, Hari Menon teamed up with V.S. Sudhakar, Vipul Parekh, Abhinay Choudhari, and V.S. Ramesh to launch Fabmart. Their vision was straightforward but one that would be revolutionary for India: build a site where families would be able to place orders for groceries and home supplies from their drawing rooms.

Fabmart was no small pilot project. The owners spent enormous sums of money to create adequate infrastructure. They established warehouses to house merchandise, employed delivery personnel, and created a website on which customers could view thousands of products. They partnered with distributors and negotiated rates, constructing a complete supply chain from the ground up.

The firm began operations in Bangalore, the IT hub of India, believing that online grocery shopping would succeed if it was to succeed anywhere in India where the greatest number of internet users resided. They carried anything from dal and rice to detergents and soap. The choice was gigantic, the prices were affordable, and the delivery guarantee was simple. On paper, everything seemed fine.

Understanding India’s Internet Reality in 1999

To see how and why Fabmart failed, one must appreciate how different India was back in 1999. From the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), we learn that only 0.5 million Indians had access to the internet in 1999, a mere 0.05% of the population. That year, for comparison, there were more than 100 million internet users in the United States.

But the statistics only reveal part of the story. The majority of Indians went online via dial-up connections that shared lines with ordinary phone calls. The connection speeds were agonizingly slow, usually 28.8 to 56 kbps. It could take several minutes to load a single webpage with images. Navigating hundreds of grocery products online was all but impossible for most consumers.

Internet connectivity was also costly. Internet charges from Rs 500 to Rs 1,500 a month when the average Indian income was about Rs 5,000. The Internet was accessed by people from cybercafes for an hour’s charge. Wasting that valuable, costly time placing grocery orders online was out of people’s minds. They could simply walk five minutes down to their neighbourhood shop instead.

Fabmart’s Operational Nightmare

Even within the minuscule portion of Indians who possessed internet connectivity at home, Fabmart encountered enormous operational issues. Fabmart had constructed its business model on home delivery, but Indian addresses were notoriously disorganised. In contrast to Western nations with neat postal codes, locating homes in Indian cities was an art form requiring landmarks, indefinite directions, and repeat phone calls.

The payment infrastructure was equally dismal. Credit card usage in India was less than 1% of the population in 1999. There were fewer than 3 million credit cards in a nation of nearly a billion people, Reserve Bank of India statistics showed. Indians used cash for nearly everything, and online payments were alien and intimidating.

Fabmart attempted to get around these issues by providing cash-on-delivery, but that had its own challenges. Delivery personnel had to make change, deal in cash, and customers would refuse orders once they had been delivered. There was a high rate of return, and each delivery failure cost the company. The unit economics just did not work when you were delivering Rs 200 worth of grocery items to individual houses with such a high rate of failure.

The Dot-Com Bubble Pops

Fabmart came online at the height of worldwide dot-com madness, when money was being poured into any business with “.com” in its title. Menon and his founders were able to raise funds initially on the strength of India’s future on the internet. Investors were convinced that internet usage would increase dramatically and Fabmart would be ideally placed to corner the market.

But by 2000, the dot-com bubble around the world burst spectacularly. Internet firms that had been worth billions went bust overnight. Investors who had been willing to finance internet firms suddenly became very risk-averse. The tap of money dried up in a matter of seconds, and firms like Fabmart that were burning cash while developing for a future market found themselves in disastrous positions.

Fabmart’s burn rate was not sustainable. Money was being spent on warehouses, employees, delivery trucks, and advertising, but revenue was barely anything. With minimal orders flowing in daily and a way to profitability nowhere on the horizon, the company was bleeding cash. When they went shopping for additional funding rounds, once open doors were now shut tight.

Why Fabmart Failed: A Deep Look

The root issue with Fabmart was a disastrous mismatch between market reality and the business model. Menon believed that India’s internet expansion would replicate the United States, but India’s infrastructure, income levels, and cultural patterns of adoption were vastly different.

The timing could not have been worse. Fabmart needed a minimum of 5-10 million potential customers to get the unit economics right, but India itself would not see 5 million internet users until 2000. The company was, in essence, selling in a non-existent market, burning investor funds while waiting for customers to turn up.

The cost profile was ruthlessly uncompetitive. Every delivery was costing Fabmart more than the profit on the goods being delivered. They were losing money on every deal, and the “make it up in volume” approach couldn’t possibly work when there was no volume. Conventional grocery stores have razor-thin 2-5% margins, and when you factor in delivery expenses, technology expenses, and customer acquisition expenses, the math just doesn’t work.

Cultural reasons also had a significant impact. Indian customers in 1999 were strongly fond of their local stores and vegetable stalls. Shopping was a social outing, and the thought of purchasing vegetables without handling and examining them was unthinkable. Online businesses were not trusted at all – tales of online fraud, while very rare simply because very few people were online, generated fear and suspicion.

The Collapse and What Came After

By the years 2000-2001, Fabmart was dying a slow death. The firm had run through its funds, investors would not invest further, and the customer base was still obstinately small. Even after desperate efforts at a change of direction and economies, there was no direction to go. The firm closed down, and Menon and his partners had to face the professional and personal consequences of failure.

For Menon, the collapse came as a shock. He had walked away from a secure corporate job, persuaded investors to believe in him, and assembled a team of people who shared his vision. Now all was undone. His reputation suffered, and many people in the business community discounted him as just another dot-com bubble victim who didn’t get the way things actually worked on the ground.

The Fabmart experience was a cautionary tale to the rest of India’s entrepreneurs. Investors avoided investing in e-commerce companies, particularly those that sold groceries and staples, for years afterwards. It would take nearly ten years before someone was willing to attempt funding these types of businesses again.

Lessons from Fabmart’s Failure

The largest lesson from the fall of Fabmart is plain but brutal: timing is more important than nearly everything. An excellent idea introduced prematurely is precisely as bad an idea as anyone could have imagined. Menon was correct about grocery shopping online – he simply picked the timing wholly wrong. Being a decade ahead of the curve meant he was wholly wrong at the times that counted.

You require infrastructure first before vision can function by itself. Fabmart wasn’t a failure because the concept was flawed. It failed because India lacked what it required – decent internet, means to pay online, and good delivery systems. No passion or hard work could correct these elementary issues. As a prerequisite to starting a business, you must ensure in good faith that the country or market truly possesses what your business requires to function.

Humans don’t shift their shopping patterns overnight, at least not for their daily necessities like grocery shopping. Indians had been purchasing groceries in the same manner for generations. Fabmart was expecting them to totally transform in an instant. Great differences in the way people shop take years, occasionally even an entire new generation. You either have to wait for individuals to be prepared, or create something that accommodates the way they currently do things.

Your business math must work from day one. Fabmart lost money on every delivery, and the promoters expected that selling more would somehow correct this. Most startups make this mistake – assuming growth will cure money issues. But if you lose money on each sale, selling more simply means losing more money. The numbers must add up from the very beginning.

The Road Ahead and BigBasket

Once Fabmart closed down, Menon did not abandon hope. He worked on other ventures for a few years while paying attention to what was happening in India. He saw internet access improve, saw more and more people purchasing smartphones, and saw younger Indians become accustomed to paying online.

In 2011, a decade and more after FabMart shut down, Menon founded BigBasket. Lots of his former Fabmart partners joined him once again. But India was not the same anymore. Over 100 million Indians were online. Smartphones were ubiquitous. Indians knew how to pay online. Other players such as Flipkart had already demonstrated that Indians would buy online provided it was good enough.

BigBasket triumphed where FabMart had failed. It became India’s largest online supermarket and was acquired by the Tata Group in 2021. The business model was essentially the same as Fabmart’s. The only difference in reality was timing. Menon had been foresighted enough to wait for the market to match his idea. His initial vision had been correct all along – it was just born too early.

FAQs

1. When did Hari Menon launch Fabmart and why did it fail?

Hari Menon launched Fabmart in 1999, but it failed because only 0.05% of Indians had internet access and the payment infrastructure didn’t exist.

2. How many internet users did India have when Fabmart started?

India had about 0.5 million internet users in 1999, which was roughly 0.05% of the population, with most using slow dial-up connections.

3. What were the key operational issues that ended Fabmart?

Fabmart experienced sluggish internet connectivity, no credit cards, disorganized delivery addresses, excessively high cash-on-delivery failure rates, and unit economics that did not work.

4. How much time passed after Fabmart before Hari Menon started BigBasket?

Menon started BigBasket in 2011, about 12 years after Fabmart, when India’s digital infrastructure had finally reached a level of maturity.

5. What is the one big learning from the failure of Fabmart?

Market timing is paramount – even genius concepts die if they are introduced before the infrastructure, customer preparedness, and payment systems are ready.

To know more about Hari Menon and his inspiring journey, follow him on LinkedIn and X, and explore BigBasket’s official website along with their X, Instagram, and Facebook pages to stay updated on their growth, innovations, and new ventures.

Read the full success story of Hari Menon and BigBasket to see how a failed idea turned into one of India’s biggest online grocery empires.

___________

Stay Inspired. Stay Informed. For more business failure stories and leadership insights, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on global business, innovation, and leadership trends.

Gold Price Falls Next Day After Australian Buyers Queue For Hours

Hundreds of Australians waited in long lines outside Sydney gold shops this week, eager to buy it on record-breaking prices. But the timing could not have been more inopportune. Immediately after, people raced to purchase gold, gold prices went down. This recent Australian news indicates the precious metal endured its worst single-day drop since 2013, slipping a whopping 5.7% in one day alone.

The queue at the ABC Bullion shop in Martin Place was the story. Individuals waited on for hours to lay their hands on gold. The price had been increasing throughout the year, reaching an all-time high of about $6755 for 31 grams this week. That is a 55 per cent increase since the beginning of January. Within 11 days in October, the price increased by $400.

Why the Sudden Plummet

Then all of a sudden, everything changed. Wednesday saw bad news for new owners. Gold prices went down hard and continued dropping the following day as well, losing another 0.6 per cent. The price dipped back to about $4080 per ounce in only two days. That’s a fast and agonising fall for anyone who purchased at the peak.

Experts are saying that gold climbed so high because people got scared. Donald Trump’s tariffs, wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, all-around increasing prices, and the US government shutdown had everyone disturbed. When things go wrong, people tend to purchase gold because they think it is a safer bet. However, this time too many people bailed in simultaneously.

Market Experts Explain What Happened

NAB’s Ray Attrill quoted an old finance adage: when gold news shifts from business sections to front sections, the peak is near. He stated the wild price rise since September was never going to continue indefinitely. Retail investors invested $26 billion in gold in investment funds last September alone. Eventually, folks began selling to make profits.

Westpac economist Pat Bustamante explained that investors feared the rally was too much. Gold and silver were overvalued, so intelligent money began unloading. This decline is not the first time this year that gold has fallen. It went down by more than $100 one day previously and lost about $300 a month after Trump’s tariff scare died down.

Gold remains 57% higher for the year, ahead of Bitcoin and most stock markets. But that will be no consolation to those who waited in line on Monday and purchased at high prices. 

News At Glance 

  • Australians waited in line for hours in Sydney to purchase gold at all-time high prices this week
  • Gold price subsequently fell 5.7 per cent in the worst one-day decline since 2013
  • Price reached $6755 per 31 grams before declining to a low of about $4080 per ounce
  • Experts attribute overvaluation to too many retail investors purchasing gold
  • Gold remains 57 per cent higher this year despite recent steep declines

FAQs

  1. Why were people lining up to purchase gold in Australia?

Gold prices reached all-time highs this year, increasing 55 per cent since the beginning of the year, prompting individuals to rush and invest before prices rose further.

  1. By how much did prices decline?

Gold lost 5.7 per cent within one day and another 0.6 per cent on the following day, declining from about $6755 to $4080 per ounce.

  1. Why did gold prices increase so much at first?

World problems such as wars, Trump’s trade tariffs, inflation, and financial uncertainty led investors to purchase gold as a haven investment.

  1. Will gold prices increase again?

No one knows for certain, but analysts say the rally was excessive and investors are now selling to take profits after the sharp advance. 

  1. Is gold a worthwhile investment this year?

Gold continues to be up 57 per cent for 2025, better than most other investments, but the latest buyers at the highs are losing money now. 

___________

For more breaking news and leadership insights, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on Australian News.

Iconic Australian Company Spring Gully Shuts Down Owing Millions

One of Australia’s favourite family-run food businesses has closed up. Spring Gully Foods, a South Australian company that took up room in kitchen pantries around the country for 80 years, was placed into administration this week with $3.8 million of debt. This latest news from Australia has left 34 employees out of work and around 1000 creditors asking themselves whether they’ll ever get a cent back.

The fourth-generation family business struggled hard to keep afloat but was unable to bounce back from losing several large contracts recently. Administrator James McPherson cited the reason that the company experienced operating losses it couldn’t overcome. The family that owns Spring Gully, who declined to comment on camera, stated this is an “extremely difficult time” and “the end of an era” for them.

Second Time Facing Collapse

This isn’t the first time Spring Gully has faced disaster. The business went into administration in 2013 as well. Then, customers stood by the brand and there was a rescue prompted by public support. This time, however, it looks like a different story. McPherson indicated he doesn’t think all creditors are likely to be repaid in full, and a repeat rescue is unlikely.

The issue boils down to competition. Foreign businesses can produce the same items and sell them at a lower price than Australian producers. Spring Gully just could not compete with those reduced prices while keeping its business in South Australia. Assets owned by the company will be liquidated to repay as much debt as they can.

Brand Might Survive

There’s a slim possibility Spring Gully products may make an appearance on supermarket shelves again someday. McPherson explained that another company may purchase the intellectual property of the brand, meaning the Spring Gully name and recipes. If that’s the case, Australians may still notice those recognisable jars and bottles on the shelves, even though the original family business has disappeared.

For the moment, the factory closed down altogether. Staff received the news that they were no longer employed, and the company that set the South Australian food culture for a generation has closed up shop. Whether the Spring Gully products return under new management is anyone’s guess, but the original family business has closed its final page.

News At Glance 

  • Spring Gully Foods shut down with $3.8 million in debt and 34 employees lost their jobs
  • The company was unable to recover after losing key contracts and running at an operating loss
  • This is the second government in 12 years after being rescued in 2013
  • Cheaper goods from international rivals made survival possible
  • Another business could purchase the brand name so goods would come back

FAQs

  1. For how long has Spring Gully Foods been operating?

Spring Gully Foods was a family-run South Australian food factory that operated for 80 years before it closed this week.

  1. How much is the company in debt?

The company owes $3.8 million to about 1000 creditors who probably won’t be repaid in full.

  1. Why did Spring Gully Foods close?

The firm lost several big contracts and couldn’t compete with cheaper overseas products, resulting in operating losses it couldn’t get over.

  1. Will Spring Gully products be around?

Perhaps – a new company could buy the intellectual property of the brand and produce Spring Gully products under new management.

  1. What became of Spring Gully staff?

All 34 staff members were made redundant when the firm stopped trading and went into administration this week.

___________

Stay Inspired. For more breaking Australian news and leadership insights, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.

‘Israel Would Lose All Support from US’: Trump Threatens Israel 

US President Donald Trump has come down hard on Israel’s proposals to annex areas of the West Bank. In shocking news that made headlines throughout the Middle East, Trump stated that Israel will lose all US support if it proceeds with annexation. His statement came before Israeli legislators voting yes on legislation that would allow Israel to annex West Bank settlements as its own land, something that even their Prime Minister objected to.

Trump stated that it won’t happen, period. The reason is straightforward, he promised the Arab nations and intends to honour it. Trump repeated himself to make the point explicit: Israel is receiving excellent support from Arab countries today, and going back on his word would stop that. Vice President JD Vance followed this message after returning from Israel, informing press that the parliament vote was “very stupid” and made him feel insulted.

Parliament Vote Causes Issue

Israel’s parliament assembled on Wednesday and voted for two bills regarding the West Bank. One of the bills is about a all settlements there. The other aims to annex one large city-settlement. Prime Minister Netanyahu attempted to block both bills, and the majority of members in his Likud party supported him. But the bills succeeded anyway since right-wing legislators pushed hard and some members of Netanyahu’s own coalition parties voted yes. Some Likud politicians simply remained silent and did not vote because opposing annexation might alienate them with voters at home.

These bills aren’t finalised. They must go through committees and receive three additional yes votes in parliament to become actual laws. Most observers believe that won’t happen now that Trump has made things so explicit.

Peace Plans May Collapse

Secretary of State Marco Rubio leapt in ahead of his Israel visit to state that the annexation vote jeopardises Trump’s Gaza peace plan. He arrived in Israel on Thursday to meet with Netanyahu and discuss how to prevent the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas from collapsing. American officials continue to jet to Israel these days to support the peace deal and ensure it does not collapse.

Trump also informed Time magazine that he believes Israel and Saudi Arabia will become friends officially before 2025 ends. He added that the Gaza crisis and Iran issues are settled now, so nothing is in the way. But Saudi Arabia continues to say it will not be friends with Israel unless Palestinians have their own state, and Israel will not even discuss that option.

News At Glance 

  • Trump declared that Israel loses all US support if annexation of the West Bank occurs
  • Israeli parliament approved two bills of annexation despite Netanyahu’s opposition
  • Vice President Vance labelled the vote as stupid and a political gesture with no meaning
  • The bills require three more votes to pass but most likely won’t pass since Trump issued a threat

FAQs

  1. What is West Bank annexation?

It means Israel is legally seizing Palestinian territory where Israeli settlers reside, which most nations claim violates global law.

  1. Why did some Israeli legislators vote for this?

Right-wing legislators desperately wanted it and received support from far-right factions within the coalition, along with some who remained quiet for fear of alienating voters.

  1. What did Trump pledge to Arab nations?

He assured them Israel would not take over the West Bank, and honouring that vow keeps one in good standing with Arab countries.

  1. Will these bills ever be Israeli law?

Doubtful because they require three additional votes and Trump’s threat makes them impossible to pass now.

  1. What does this mean for Middle East peace?

American officials indicate that it would blow up peace negotiations in Gaza and prevent Israel from befriending Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations

___________

Stay Informed. For more breaking stories from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine and subscribe to our newsletter.

US Hits Russian Oil Giants With Heavy Sanctions

Breaking news, the United States imposed severe sanctions on Russia’s two largest energy companies, Rosneft and Lukoil. This news follows as President Donald Trump is taking a stronger stance against Russia’s war in Ukraine. The action caught many by surprise because last week Trump announced that he would sit down with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Budapest to negotiate ending the war. Now the meeting is cancelled, and international oil prices surged almost 5% as markets respond to the news.

The two Russian oil firms supply over 5% of the global oil supply. With sanctions, other nations risk economic consequences if they continue to purchase Russian oil. India and China, which purchase the majority of Russia’s oil exports, are now anxious. Chinese state-run oil companies have already suspended purchasing Russian oil for the moment. Indian refineries, the largest consumers of Russian seaborne oil, will drastically cut back on imports. This will be painful to Russia’s revenues but it also will require India and China to seek alternative sources, driving prices up everywhere.

Trump Shifts on Russia

White House President Trump said why in the White House, that the scheduled meeting with Putin “didn’t feel right” anymore. He reported his numerous discussions with the Russian president were going nowhere. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent clarified that America is determined to stop the money Russia uses to finance the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Sales of oil and gas account for roughly a quarter of Russia’s state budget, and that money goes directly into the war effort.

Russia moved swiftly to retaliate, terming the sanctions unproductive. Moscow has developed a strong immunity to such restrictions over the years, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson indicated. The conditions for halting the war set by Russia have not changed, Russian officials stated, despite Ukraine and European nations viewing those demands as essentially asking for Ukraine to surrender. 

Global Impact and What Comes Next

The European Union is also acting with its 19th package of sanctions on Russia, such as prohibiting Russian liquefied natural gas importation. The leaders of the EU met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Brussels to consider lending Ukraine a 140 billion euro loan through frozen Russian assets. Moscow threatened to retaliate painfully if the assets are confiscated.

Zelenskiy praised the United States for imposing new sanctions, but he asserted that additional pressure is required in order to compel Russia to agree to a ceasefire. Russia is resistant to any ceasefire because it thinks it would only serve to allow Ukraine time to acquire more weapons. Russian troops keep advancing on the battlefield, and according to Moscow, it holds the upper hand at present.

Some analysts think Russia may sell its oil at even larger discounts to retain customers in the face of sanctions risk. Increased world oil prices may, nonetheless, enable Russia to recapture some of those losses.

News At Glance

  • The US imposed sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil firms, Rosneft and Lukoil, impacting 5% of global oil supply
  • Trump cancelled the scheduled summit with Putin, stating talks were not proceeding toward halting the Ukraine war
  • India and China are cutting back Russian oil imports, with Chinese firms already halting them temporarily
  • Global oil prices surged 5% on the day the sanctions were announced as markets fear supply disruptions

FAQs

  1. Why are sanctioned Russian oil companies now being targeted by the US?

President Trump is seeking to reduce Russia’s funding for the war in Ukraine and press Moscow into accepting a ceasefire or peace accord.

  1. Which nations would be most hurt by Russian oil sanctions?

India and China are hit hardest as they purchase most of Russia’s oil exports and now have to look for alternative suppliers.

  1. How much money does Russia make from selling oil and gas?

It provides around 25% of Russia’s government budget and is presently 21% lower compared to the previous year.

  1. Are oil prices going to continue increasing due to these sanctions?

Prices rose by 5% in the beginning and are likely to rise further if India and China fail to substitute Russian oil with imports from other nations.

  1. Did Trump previously sanction Russian oil firms?

This is a dramatic policy turnaround since Trump had earlier shied away from imposing such heavy sanctions and was contemplating peace negotiations with Putin.

___________

For more breaking stories and leadership insights from around the world, explore Inspirepreneur Magazine.